Cancer Research UK is one of the leading public sector funders of cancer trials in the UK and have developed a Committee, the Clinical Trials Advisory and Awards Committee (CTAAC) to streamline and speed-up the peer review process of cancer trial proposals.This Committee reviews and funds cancer clinical trial on behalf of Cancer Research UK. The main foci are phase III therapeutic and some large phase II trials. Please note: for small phase II trials and feasibility studies please view the Feasibility Study Project Grants web page.
CTAAC will initially review applications for cancer trials as outline proposals. The exception to this will be finalised protocols of international studies and protocols submitted for peer review and endorsement by the Committee (see below). These may be submitted directly as a full proposal.
Assessment Criteria
The scope of CTAAC's responsibilities lie in two areas: to assess the scientific and technical merit of an application and to comment on other aspects of the application, which should be clearly separated from the assessment of the scientific merit.
Assessment criteria for CTAAC outline applications are as follows:
- Clinical importance of the research question;
- Scientific importance of the research question;
- Adequacy of background and preliminary data;
- Strength of study design, including statistical design;
- Expected interest/appeal to patients and likelihood of adequate accrual;
- Anticipated opening for trial in portfolio.
For full proposals the strengths of each application in all of these areas will be assessed by CTAAC and used to arrive at an overall score.
Please note for proposals that incorporate separate (although integrated) trials for sub-sets of patient populations you must submit clear and separate outline proposals for each component of the study including trial design and statistics, in order to allow each trial to be reviewed as stand-alone proposals.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funding dictates that all trials are subject to national, competitive peer review, therefore the Committee must be given the opportunity to review and question (and if appropriate) reject separate components. This type of outline proposal should be submitted with a cover letter, which includes justification for integrating the various components of the study, including that of cost effectiveness.
The Committee recognises the advantages of submitting a single full proposal both in terms of cost effectiveness to the Charity but also in negotiating the necessary legislative requirements.
Therefore, if you are successful at the outline stage the Committee will provide clear guidance on which components of the trials should be incorporated within a single full proposal.
Eligibility
Applicant must be from a UK university, clinical centre, or clinical trials unit.
Please note: Biological studies will not be funded by CTAAC unless they are being used to define treatment options. In all other cases, a separate application to the Translational Research in Clinical Trials Committee (TRICC) must be submitted
Period of funding
Funding is provided for trials that are up to 10 years in duration.
Extensions
Extensions can be applied for following consultation with the Committee Secretariat; you must contact the office 6-8 months in advance of funding completion.
All extension applications must be submitted on an extension application form. All extensions require a covering letter fully justifying the reasons for an extension request.